Delete Redirect to Tips for flying per Peter. While this might be a valid travel article for someone interested in writing one, the current article is a copyvio. Additionally, general preference is to add information on travel topics to existing articles (in this case Tips for flying) and split it out only after discussion and a consensus that a separate article is warranted. -- (WT-en) Ryan• (talk) • 17:23, 18 December 2010 (EST)
Delete Tips for flying doesn't look very useful, but this is definitely not necessary. Airport security is extremely simple to get through and they will quickly correct you if you are not doing it correctly. (WT-en) ChubbyWimbus 21:29, 18 December 2010 (EST)
Delete Redirect to Tips for flying per Peter. A blatant copyvio originally written with a somewhat patronising tone and from a quite myopic cultural standpoint. It is an appallingly US centric viewpoint and has been placed on WT by someone who apparently has their vision limited to that available from within the socio-political boundaries and cognitive limitations of the United States of America. Absolute rubbish, get rid of it. As (WT-en) Ryan hints, airport and airline security issues should be dealt with as a topic within Tips for flying rather than an article in it's own right. Let this highly subjective GWOT inspired compliance inducing nonsense get treated as it should be, as a topic within a bigger picture. WT should not promote this sort of naive, myopic and culturally filtered content as being of worth or value to travellers. (WT-en) felix 09:40, 19 December 2010 (EST)
Delete - if just to be rid of the patronizing tone. Who writes this junk? (I feel strongly about this) (WT-en) PerryPlanetTalk 10:32, 19 December 2010 (EST)
P.S. Ironically, I'm writing this from the airport! And the advice in said article didn't seem too applicable... (WT-en) PerryPlanetTalk 10:33, 19 December 2010 (EST)
Français
Italiano
