Latest comment: 1 year ago by SHB2000 in topic Warnings and copyvios


2021 Archives for 2022 (current) 2023

This page contains all the discussions from 2022.


How we will see unregistered users

Hi!

You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.

When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.

Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.

If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.

We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.

Thank you. /Johan (WMF)

18:14, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

01:24, 11 January 2022 (UTC)

Website that you may find helpful

I noticed you were creating articles for World Heritage Sites that lack them. https://www.worldheritagesite.org/ is in my opinion the best place to research these sites and has useful information that's aimed at tourists rather than conservationists, also the official UNESCO website's design is really bad in my opinion. Here's the pages on Ichkeul and Tsodilo Tai123.123 (talk) 06:41, 12 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the link. I'd never known that website and I agree that it is definitely much much better than whc.unesco.org. I think Ypsilon created an article for most world heritage sites, although there were some like Dinosaur Provincial Park that was only created in 2021. SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta.wikimedia) 11:17, 12 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
Yes, when new WHS come up (after their yearly conference every July) I add the UNESCO icons to banners of articles we have and create new articles if the site merits its own article. --Ypsilon (talk) 12:46, 15 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

This Month in GLAM: December 2021





Headlines
Read this edition in fullSingle-page

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

19:55, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Template

I was reading Ancient Mesopotamia and I found template listings instead of template marker. Which template do you think is more suitable for ancient sites? For Ancient Kangleipak, I used template marker! Haoreima (talk) 11:33, 18 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Either is generally fine. We don't have a style on this. Ancient Egypt, Ned Kelly tourism (I wrote that one so I remember it well), or Indus Valley Civilisation seem to use listings while New South Wales national parks (it still sits a red link farm :-( although it looks much better than it was in August) uses markers. It's really up to you to pick which style you prefer.
Anime and manga in Japan is another one, but it uses the see, do, eat, sleep et cetera listings depending on the category it falls under. SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta.wikimedia) 11:52, 18 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
Have you decided to create a banner? For that, have you found any suitable image for Ancient Kangleipak? If not, what will one of these look like in banner format?
Haoreima (talk) 12:22, 18 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
If not perfectly suitable, shall we make a collage? Is collage allowed in Wikivoyage banners? Haoreima (talk) 12:23, 18 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
I'll see how they look on croptool. And from Wikivoyage:Image policy, I don't think it's allowed. --SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta.wikimedia) 12:25, 18 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
The lions don't seem to fit and the second seems to cut out most of it. Do you have any other image suggestions which can hopefully fit the 7:1 banner ratio? SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta.wikimedia) 12:29, 18 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
Sure, I will search for it. :-) Haoreima (talk) 04:01, 19 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
@Haoreima Hey Haoreima. Was wondering if you found an alternative that I can crop. Just needs to be over 2100x300 pixels and fit in a 7:1 ratio. SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta.wikimedia) 12:14, 29 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
Thank you a lot for your concern. Only a few people are kind like you. Oh, I am just searching for it. Presently, I don't. If not found appropriate, I will have to capture some photos myself. :) Haoreima (talk) 12:17, 29 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
:-) Take your time. There's no hurry. --SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta.wikimedia) 12:18, 29 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nigeria

I'm wondering if it makes sense to put off article mergers and deletions until after January 31. It's only a couple of weeks, and new article creation will probably settle down after then. I don't think were going to have much success in encouraging quality over quantity at this point. What do you think? Ground Zero (talk) 23:29, 18 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Okay sure. I'll put off everything until then. But what about those that fail wiaa such as the hotel I put up for deletion? --SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta.wikimedia) 23:32, 18 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Australian markets

I made a mention of the Sydney Fish Market, Central Market in Adelaide, and Queen Victoria Market in Melbourne in the section about markets. I wonder if the Fremantle Markets should get a mention too. I know locals from Fremantle do not like it when people refer to it as part of Perth, but in practice it really is part of the Perth metropolitan area. The dog2 (talk) 22:03, 20 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Yeah, I know someone from Fremantle who now lives in my neighbourhood and they usually insist that they were not from Perth even though it's merely in the southwestern suburbs of Perth. I'd say mention it
As a side note, should something like this also go in Shopping in Australia? SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta.wikimedia) 22:06, 20 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
I guess they could. Whenever I wanted to buy macadamia nuts to bring back to Singapore as souvenirs for friends and relatives, Central Market was where I would go. Speaking of which, are there any other food markets that you think are worth a mention? The dog2 (talk) 22:09, 20 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
Maybe Paddy's Market in Haymarket could also get a mention. SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta.wikimedia) 22:13, 20 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
In that case, maybe you could expand the section somewhat to give more information about traditional food markets. I'm not sure if there are any in Brisbane given that I last visited Brisbane when I was 7 years old. The dog2 (talk) 22:32, 20 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
Sure, I'll expand that section. re Brisbane, I don't know about the ones in Brisbane either merely because I never went to any of them. SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta.wikimedia) 22:34, 20 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

This Month in Education: January 2022

21:38, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

Camping in Australia

I wonder if you want to start this topic. Camping is quite a nice way to experience nature in Australia, and, and if you're familiar, you can cover some of the legal considerations as well. The dog2 (talk) 01:03, 25 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

I actually had this in my userspace since July (feel free to edit it). Coincidentally, I stumbled across it yesterday, and I was actually planning to revive that. SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta.wikimedia) 01:05, 25 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Review of Cocos Malay phrasebook

Hi, I have recently been inactive here, but I have returned to work on the Cocos Malay phrasebook. Considering it is nearly finished (and I will complete it soon), could you please review it and change its status from "outline" to the appropriate status? Thanks. Basa Pulu Kokos (talk) 03:25, 25 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hello Basa Pulu Kokos, per Wikivoyage:Phrasebook status, there needs to be a pronunciation guide before such an upgrade. SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta.wikimedia) 03:34, 25 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
@Basa Pulu Kokos I upgraded it to usable with a link to the Malay phrasebook. Thanks for creating that phrasebook :-) SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta.wikimedia) 08:29, 26 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 30 January 2022

17:42, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

Block of 112.134.171.76

You and I can both see the telltale signs of a hotel publicist, but I don't think their listings were that bad, and I was going to either edit my post or add another one to the effect that I didn't actually revert their listing. Plus, we didn't warn that IP before a block. So I would lift the block, but I wasn't going to do so without contacting you. What do you think? Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:06, 1 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nevermind, I see your explanation. Good call. Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:06, 1 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
Yeah I warned the IP on another page regarding the use of USD for destinations clearly where USD won't be accepted in User talk:116.206.244.93 and User talk:175.157.226.124 but they just ignored me :-(. For that, per Wikivoyage:How to handle unwanted edits#Escalating user blocks, I blocked them for three days. Not to forget the touting... SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta.wikimedia) 09:11, 1 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
Also looks like one of their edit was reverted by @Ibaman:. Currently on the hunt or further edits by this IP-hopping tout. SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta.wikimedia) 09:19, 1 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
A few years ago, loads of Ascott properties were listed throughout the world by folks who if I remember listed only them and one other chain. We should be on the lookout for that. I delisted one Ascott property this user added, as there were plenty of other hotels listed in that article and no real reason to play around with a touting paid publicist. Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:30, 1 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
This IP seems to be adding a lot of Parkroyal listings too. Perhaps time to delist all of them? --SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta.wikimedia) 09:31, 1 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
I don't know. It's always hard to know which listings were added legitimately on this site. For that reason, I never trust hotel or restaurant listings here and always cross-reference them with other sites. Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:37, 1 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

program vs programme

To answer your question, in Singapore "program" is used in the context of a computer program, but otherwise, it's always "programme". So essentially, the same as in the UK. The dog2 (talk) 16:04, 2 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

I see. Was just asking because in Australia, it's "program" for everything, similar to the U.S. SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta.wikimedia) 20:19, 2 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

"Exact date not relevant"

You changed "Newly built in the last several years" to "Newly built" in Kabul, as "exact date not relevant in a travel guide". The exact date is not, but "newly built" needs at least a year.

In this case an IP editor had copied the listing from WT, and the venue was "newly built in the last several years" already back in 2013. Not that critical for a cricket stadium, but from another IP it was added that the airport is "fully open", also a WT copy, and also that wording was there in 2013.

LPfi (talk) 09:58, 3 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

I'm not sure whether you're talking about the right diff – my edit was Special:Diff/4382704 which was a copyedit and removing 15 from August 15. Was there an edit conflict or something? SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta.wikimedia) 10:02, 3 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
Oops. It seems the IP editor added a redundant listing. Ours had been edited to remove the odd "in the last several years". I removed ours thinking it was the newly added one, and as it had "changed" from last I checked, I though it must have been edited in the only edit made since it was added. Sorry. –LPfi (talk) 10:48, 3 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
No problems. That edit history with two IPs copying was confusing at first, but thanks for handling the copyvio. SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta.wikimedia) 10:50, 3 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Tentative list

Just making sure you're aware than on the UNESCO tentative list just means that the government as submitted to unesco for review and unesco hasn't reviewed it yet. Your description of Qajartalik on Qikertaaluk Island made it seem like it was already a unesco site. Tai123.123 (talk) 02:22, 4 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Yes, I'm well aware of it. I should have perhaps worded it better on Qikertaaluk Island. SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta.wikimedia) 05:21, 4 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

it takes a while sometime

walking the nullarbor for instance, which on some wikis is no longer a plain ? I'm back and intact, sorry for the delay in replies at various instances... JarrahTree (talk) 01:14, 7 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hey JarrahTree. Nice to see you back :-) No need to be sorry, I guess technical issues are out of what you're in control of. SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta.wikimedia) 06:26, 7 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

21:16, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

Request for semi-protection: North Korea

I would like to request the semi-protection (only allow autoconfirmed and confirmed users to edit) for the page North Korea. It is clearly a vandalism target page and many instances of vandalism have occurred on the page. Thanks. Basa Pulu Kokos (talk) 09:46, 11 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

I started a discussion at Talk:North Korea#Protection many moons ago. It didn't get the consensus to so unfortunately can't do. SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta.wikimedia) 09:48, 11 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
I don't think you need consensus to temporarily semi-protect the article if you think that's warranted. Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:51, 11 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
Much of those edits were by Brendan (which isn't vandalism but still unconstructive). Page protecting against him won't do anything. SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta.wikimedia) 22:11, 11 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Basa Pulu Kokos

They're block-evading?? Did they do anything wrong on this site? Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:08, 12 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

They're now globally locked by Sotiale, but it's the same user as Te Reo Ahitereiria according to a CU investigation (see m:Steward requests/Checkuser#Basa Pulu [email protected]). Only did the additional block in order to enable autoblock on the IP they used. SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta.wikimedia) 01:22, 12 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
I see. What did they do wrong on other sites? Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:31, 12 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
Vandalism at least, according to w:Special:Contributions/Te Reo Ahitereiria. SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta.wikimedia) 02:00, 12 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
@Ikan Kekek Looks like they're back on meta making personal attacks against Graham87. I'd not be surprised if they're back here. SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta.wikimedia) 07:25, 14 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

This Month in GLAM: January 2022





Headlines
Read this edition in fullSingle-page

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

19:18, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

Fix typos in one click

The word is "thoroughly", not "throughly" Please amend these to the correct spelling, and please make sure you're double checking your own spelling before using this tool.ThunderingTyphoons! (talk) 17:31, 16 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

I am also confused by the talk page messages. I have seen two of them in the last days, but that's just in articles that happen to be on my watchlist. They are very confusing and hard to decipher, and those two seemed to be obvious non-typos. –LPfi (talk) 20:04, 16 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
Apologies for not checking properly. Will do in future. SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta.wikimedia) 20:51, 16 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Problem edits on sv-voy

I checked the edits on sv-voy. Surprisingly good Swedish and no false information. Whether to use native or translated names is a difficult judgement, I'd need to check sources for best practises on each name. I think there is too little activity over there to spend energy on fighting blocked users doing harmless edits, and possibly explaining reverts. If unconstructive reverts – even well-justified ones – start to dominate, the project has a hard time attracting users. –LPfi (talk) 20:24, 16 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

@LPfi That's interesting to know. Is Swedish easier for machine translations to get accurate than Finnish? I once heard that Finnish isn't easy to learn and machine translations to get perfect, which explains the unusual previous edits by Luchy04. SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta.wikimedia) 06:33, 17 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
Swedish is a Germanic language like German and English, while Finnish isn't even an Indo-European one. Relations between words in Finnish are encoded in suffixes in a sometimes very intricate way, so getting it right requires semantic understanding. Translating word for word, with just a little tweaking, such as between Germanic languages, may give comprehensible results when translating into Finnish, but seldom anything resembling idiomatic language, and the other way round the result is often pure nonsense – which is the result also when trying to get idiomatic language without really understanding the semantics. –LPfi (talk) 10:12, 17 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
That makes sense. SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta.wikimedia) 10:16, 17 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
If Silicon Valley had been in Finland, we might have got good machine translations between, say, Finnish and Hungarian. Translating across language families is harder, and the language models developed for Indo-European languages don't work with Finnish. Now, Finland has quite some high-tech and linguistic know-how and high-level research, and the need for machine translation across language boundaries (such as to Swedish and English), so we will probably see reasonable machine translations at some point. –LPfi (talk) 10:22, 17 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
Yeah, it's interesting to see more and more languages that have machine translators these days. SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta.wikimedia) 10:29, 17 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Loktak lake

Hello SHB2000! In simple english wikipedia article wikipedia:simple:Loktak lake, similar things are going on by an anonymous like the one done in wikivoyage India page, which needs reverting. I reverted two times. Now, it's still re editing it. What shall we do? Haoreima (talk) 16:13, 21 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Are you suggesting a Wikivoyage article should be written about this lake? Based on the Simple Wikipedia entry, it doesn't come close to passing the Wikivoyage:What is an article test. Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:27, 21 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
@Ikan Kekek: No! I am reminding about the persistent vandalism that took place in the wikivoyage article India. Similar things happen in simple english wikipedia article "Loktak lake". As of now, idk what to do. So, I was asking SHB2000! Haoreima (talk) 02:35, 22 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
You mean that obnoxious user is there? If you're an admin there, block, revert and if necessary, semi-protect the article for a relatively short time. If not, let others deal with it. I'm not sure what else to say. Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:14, 22 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
That IP hopping user has w:WP:CIR issues and was very brave to revert someone who's been active since the times of Wikitravel and such they were rightly blocked for vandalising pages. For this IP, I warned them on their talk. SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta.wikimedia) 05:19, 22 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
I don't think that user is incompetent, just nasty, rigid and often wrong. Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:24, 22 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
Them not willing to take messages given to them and then accuse both of us of "edit-warring" is definitely incompetent, on top of being nasty, rigid and wrong 90pc of the time. SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta.wikimedia) 05:27, 22 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
No, it's reflexively blaming others. That's not incompetent, just anti-social. Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:34, 22 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
Makes sense. SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta.wikimedia) 05:34, 22 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
Yeah! Thanks for warning that ip. Meanwhile, I have added more and more references to the article about the very fact so that such arguments may not happen in future. :-) Haoreima (talk) 05:36, 22 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
Unfortunately, that editor is an IP hopping user so they could be back under another IP. SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta.wikimedia) 05:38, 22 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
The first reason (though unreasonable) given by that ip was "not mentioned in Regular English Wikipedia article". Yes, "Loktak lake-World's only floating lake" isn't mentioned in Regular English article but it's not a reasonable argument. :-) Haoreima (talk) 05:39, 22 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
That IP comes up with weird and insane arguments just to get an article the way they want it to be. The page history for Quetzaltenango is an interesting one to look at. SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta.wikimedia) 05:44, 22 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
Thanks the article Quetzaltenango is protected. Else, there might be further troubles. On the other hand, as you said, it came true. That ip returns with another ip. As of now, he only talks in the talk page and idk if he will do the same thing again. Haoreima (talk) 05:49, 22 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

19:12, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 February 2022

This Month in Education: February 2022

23:00, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

Re:Space centres and flight-sites in India

Here are some museums which are operated fully or partly by Indian Space Research Organisation (ISRO)

For launch/flight Site-

For Space Centres-

Map
Map of Archive 2022
Major Indian Space Flight Centres
Centre Location Notes Geo-location
Space Applications Centre (SAC) Ahmedabad Mainly for Research and development 1 SAC
Vikram Sarabhai Space Centre (VSSC) Thiruvananthapuram Research Centre 2 VSSC
U R Rao Satellite Centre (URSC) Bengaluru Satellite development and manufacturing 3 URSC
Liquid Propulsion Systems Centre (LPSC) Thiruvananthapuram, Bengaluru Developing rocket engines 4 LPSC15 LPSC2
Satish Dhawan Space Centre (SDSC) SHAR Sriharikota Range The main centre where the launches take place 6 SDSC
ISRO Telemetry, Tracking and Command Network (ISTRAC) Bengaluru Similar to NASA's DSN. 7 ISTRAC

2006nishan178713t@lk 06:27, 2 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

@2006nishan178713: Nice work. I was always curious as to why there was no sites in India and it was one of the reasons I opposed a feature nomination because it was so US-Euro centric with barely any sites in Asia, which has two of the four largest space agencies. --SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta.wikimedia) 06:30, 2 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
Yes, it is Western-centric. Also ISRO is kind of conservative and doesn't publicise that much. 2006nishan178713t@lk 06:39, 2 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
Makes sense. SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta.wikimedia) 06:41, 2 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
I think that due to the COVID pandemic, the Space Theme Park and the launch gallery registration is halted temporarily. 2006nishan178713t@lk 11:30, 2 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
Yeah many places have been hit by Covid, but I think you can still mention them, just mention that it is temporarily halted. SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta.wikimedia) 11:34, 2 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
I will do it after 9th of March, probably next Thursday, I will be busy from tomorrow. By the way, can you give me some idea about how to create a static map like the one below? It's not urgent. Cheers!! 2006nishan178713t@lk 11:58, 2 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
There's a good tutorial at Wikivoyage:How to draw static maps. SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta.wikimedia) 20:09, 2 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
Thanks 2006nishan178713t@lk 08:03, 3 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Comment in Star nominations:

Your comment "Pretty much so" of 08:45, 1 March 2022 (UTC) appears to be in the wrong place based on indentation and relevance to the text above. Should it refer to the previous comment of mine? diff

Also, I will take you up on your offer to explain/demonstrate/link to help for making a static map toggleable. Cheers, • • • Peter (Southwood) (talk): 10:00, 2 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Map of the Whittle Rock main reef — switch to interactive map
Map of the Whittle Rock main reef
Yes, I think I put it in the wrong place. For the togglable static map, all that needs to be added to the page is the following code:
{{Regionlist | regionmap=Dive sites of the Whittle Rock Reef high resolution.png | regionmaptext=Map of the Whittle Rock main reef | regionmapsize=<replace this with the size you want>px  | regionInteractiveMap=map1 }} 
Not sure on what size would suit, but as an example, if I use 500px, I get the following on the right, except that the markers showing on this page would be of those in India because of the markers listed above, but that won't be the case with Diving the Cape Peninsula and False Bay/Whittle Rock article and it should give you the markers listed there. --SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta.wikimedia) 11:17, 2 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

What happened?

Asking about this. Something went on off-site? Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:21, 5 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Their username is very much a personal attack on ShakespeareFan00, and their editing shows that too. SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta.wikimedia) 21:43, 5 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
I unblocked them, except for editing that one userspace draft. I'll fully unblock them once they respond. SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta.wikimedia) 22:17, 5 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
Hmmm...totally not obvious to me. Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:21, 6 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
The thing that's suspicious to me is that how can a brand new user with only two global edits have a username of "Tour Evil Alter Ego" (which I suspect the "your" refers to ShakespeareFan00) not be intimidating ShakespeareFan00. SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta.wikimedia) 08:42, 6 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

21:16, 7 March 2022 (UTC)

Addition of religion

Hello SHB2000! I was thinking about altering this file by adding a new symbol:

Symbols of religions

This is the new symbol:-

What do you think? Haoreima (talk) 12:25, 8 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

It would be nice to add, but unfortunately, I'm not too sure how to do add it though. I could do it if it's an svg file through Inkscape, but this seems to be a png file :-(. SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta.wikimedia) 12:28, 8 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for reply! I will put this issue at Commons' village pump. I was once reluctant to do so because of a slightly relevant discrimination once happened with me in Simple English Wikipedia. :-) Haoreima (talk) 12:37, 8 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
To make a complete row, I have to find three more symbols, among which I found two more:-
ancient Egyptian religion symbol
ancient Greek religion symbol
I need one more. Could you please discover one? Else, people in Commons may not be willing to help me. Haoreima (talk) 12:46, 8 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
It's ok. I found it. The fourth is Celtic/Gallic religion. Haoreima (talk) 18:03, 8 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
Rastafari could be a good addition too. Gizza (roam) 23:30, 8 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
Can do it if you give me the svg file. Won't take too long. SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta.wikimedia) 03:03, 9 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
If you get the svg file, will you revert the existing file or create a new file derived from the former one? Haoreima (talk) 05:04, 9 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
Per c:COM:OVERWRITE, upload a new file. --SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta.wikimedia) 07:07, 9 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
Thanks! I will inform you as soon as I get that! :) Haoreima (talk) 12:40, 9 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Kick scooter wording

In an edit summary on Helsinki you asked "can someone check this paragraph that it's not duplicated from somewhere else?"

I think all kick scooter entries in Finland are copied more or less verbatim by User:Vkem (often without logging in) from my wordings in Turku. As I changed my wording, it usually propagated to their edits, with a significant lag (I assume they added it to some bot script, which they didn't update regularly).

While the copying infringes on my copyright and I don't like them copying my text in this way (no attribution or reference whatsoever), I am not going to make a fuzz about it.

The correction of grammar should of course be done in all the articles where the phrase can be found :-(

LPfi (talk) 12:50, 9 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Aside from copyright, the problem is the same as with mobile phones in Nigeria: such detailed text suggests that the facts are valid locally, and I don't trust Vkem to have checked more than some of the points made. Attribution would be no issue for me without that aspect. –LPfi (talk) 12:56, 9 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for checking the kick scooter thing. :-) SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta.wikimedia) 20:30, 9 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

This Month in GLAM: February 2022





Headlines
Read this edition in fullSingle-page

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

22:08, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

User:ShakespeareFan00/Da'nunder

Feel free to edit.

I had some things I was world-building with, but would appreciate some input from yourself and the other Australian contingent on Wikiovage. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:09, 4 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Pretty cool draft :-). I'm curious as to where you had gotten the name Androostun. Can't relate it to any Australian place name, and the closest I can think of is Adelaide – was it a made up one? The New Woomera one is interesting, and couldn't help but laugh at the vegemite reference ;-) SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta.wikimedia) 11:12, 4 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
Androoostun is a contraction of 'Andrews Town' and was developed specifically for the article. I'd imagined the Hibern Isles, to essentially have a more Celtic and Gaelic character (ie. Scots/Irish influences) then Nova Australis.
Well the other 'ration' item on early survery ships I should probably might mention would be the Soychkio sausage, which is a soy/bean/cereal based processed sausage. If you combine it with Vegeimite in a roll, you get the Dan'under variant on the Hot dog. :lol:

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:01, 4 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

lol. i'm kinda curious to see how the draft will turn out ;-) SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta.wikimedia) 12:06, 4 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
Well, I'm still world-building, and I'd appreciate it being a joint effort, so please feel free to edit. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:56, 4 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

@SHB2000: The draft is a little bit more mature. I'd really appreciate an Australian Wikivoyager leaving some comments on the talk page on whats missing or doesn't make sense. I've been wondering what I can have as "Ute" equivalent. My thinking was some sort of light-to cargo quadcopter or ultralight? ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 16:31, 8 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

@ShakespeareFan00 Had a read of it, and I can't really see anything that's missing – looking good :-). As a suggestion, the external territories of Australia (Norfolk Island, Christmas Island, Cocos (Keeling) Islands) and possibly include the uninhabited ones such as Ashmore and Cartier Islands, Coral Sea Islands, or Heard Island and McDonald Islands could act like moons. Maybe a joke about the largely unrecognised w:Australian Antarctic Territory too. Don't know how to implement that though. SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta.wikimedia) 07:11, 14 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
Generally Terrestrial Worlds, don't necessarily have more than 1 or 2 moons. I'll bear it in mind though.. Maybe one of the Moons is a Penal colony, or where they ship the people that bring in 'item zero' at the NQZ? ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:46, 14 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
I also challange you to work out where I got the 'Sydbourne' opera productions titles from ;) ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:51, 14 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Triple 0 response times..

Is this a concern of relevance to a traveller?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uZQ4rtTsAdE https://www.news.com.au/national/victoria/politics/opposition-slams-victorian-government-over-triplezero-review/news-story/820b7ab4494c09cad435b31a99f26a5a

The basic concern expressed in media coverage seems to be that in Victoria. Triple Zero(000) response times might be longer than people expect.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 14:39, 16 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

@ShakespeareFan00 Not sure. I didn't know about that until now, as most of the news feed here in NSW is about the floods and the Russia-Ukraine invasion. Don't really have an opinion on it tbh. SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta.wikimedia) 07:54, 17 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Growth Newsletter #20

17:11, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

possible duplication of Glacier National Park disambiguation

I noticed your work on Glacier National Park, but you may have introduced a duplicate. A redirect of Glacier National Park to/from Glacier National Park (disambiguation) page and merge of links may be necessary or other disambiguation text between the two - see https://en.wikivoyage.org/wiki/Wikivoyage:Travellers%27_pub#Are_these_duplicate_disambiguation_pages? Wolfgang8741 (talk) 17:04, 17 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

@Wolfgang8741 Apologies about that :-(. Seems to be fixed by Mx. Granger now. SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta.wikimedia) 05:14, 18 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Lengthening of block

You lengthened this block from 2 hours to 3 days without giving a reason. Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:36, 18 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

per Wikivoyage:How to handle unwanted edits, the first block should be three days. SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta.wikimedia) 00:42, 18 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
We have latitude to give a briefer block first if we want to. Had that user come back and continued disrupting, they would have gotten a 3-day block quickly. Now, I arguably look a little silly. Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:50, 18 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

"a settlement needs to have 10k inhabitants to be called a 'city'"?

Maybe in Australia. There is no such rule in the U.S. Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:30, 18 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

I thought that was an internationally agreed term. Doing some more research, there seems to be conflicting definitions on how many are needed for a city, but I've never heard a city of 1.5k as a city. However, Wikipedia seems to say that in the US, a city can have a minimum between 1,500 and 5,000. I'll revert my edit. SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta.wikimedia) 05:35, 18 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
Oh I've noticed you've copyedited it. Thanks for doing that. SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta.wikimedia) 05:36, 18 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
I don't think Wikipedia is right. Different states have different definitions. In New York, the Village of Hempstead has over 55,000 inhabitants, the Hamlet of Riverhead has around 15,000, and the City of Sherill has just over 3,000. Look at w:List of cities in Alaska, too. The smallest one had 21 inhabitants as of the 2020 Census. See also w:Kupreanof, Alaska. It's an incorporated city. Someone needs to edit the conflicted statement on Wikipedia. Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:02, 18 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
I just looked at your link. You misread it: "Common population definitions for an urban area (city or town) range between 1,500 and 50,000 people, with most U.S. states using a minimum between 1,500 and 5,000 inhabitants.[13][14] Some jurisdictions set no such minima.[15]" You had to pay attention to the word "most" and/or read the next sentence. Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:03, 18 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Movement Strategy and Governance News – Issue 5

I'm sorry about the late delivery of this newsletter. Within the newsletter was material about an ongoing vote, which closes in under 20 hours.

Please share the information links with interested users: Project OverviewUniversal Code of ConductEnforcement guidelines (proposed) • VotingVoter informationVoting link


Movement Strategy and Governance News

Issue 5, January 2022Read the full newsletter


Welcome to the fifth issue of Movement Strategy and Governance News (formerly known as Universal Code of Conduct News)! This revamped newsletter distributes relevant news and events about the Movement Charter, Universal Code of Conduct, Movement Strategy Implementation grants, Board elections and other relevant MSG topics. This Newsletter will be distributed quarterly, while more frequent Updates will also be delivered weekly or bi-weekly to subscribers. Please remember to subscribe here if you would like to receive these updates.

  • Call for Feedback about the Board elections - We invite you to give your feedback on the upcoming WMF Board of Trustees election. This call for feedback went live on 10th January 2022 and will be concluded on 16th February 2022. (continue reading)
  • Universal Code of Conduct Ratification - In 2021, the WMF asked communities about how to enforce the Universal Code of Conduct policy text. The revised draft of the enforcement guidelines should be ready for community vote in March. (continue reading)
  • Movement Strategy Implementation Grants - As we continue to review several interesting proposals, we encourage and welcome more proposals and ideas that target a specific initiative from the Movement Strategy recommendations. (continue reading)
  • The New Direction for the Newsletter - As the UCoC Newsletter transitions into MSG Newsletter, join the facilitation team in envisioning and deciding on the new directions for this newsletter. (continue reading)
  • Diff Blogs - Check out the most recent publications about MSG on Wikimedia Diff. (continue reading)

Xeno (WMF) (talk) 04:15, 21 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Taking a step back

Swept in from the pub

As you probably know, I'm very active here, and that's because I, just like most of you do, edit this travel guide in my leisure time. But these days, I've been endlessly obsessed with the one user from Queensland that we all know. And I can probably confidently say that 95 percent of my recent rollbacks used are reverting him, and it's become a bad habit – and it's just as unproductive, and we all know that there's better things to do than rollbacking copyvios and doing /64 blocks. And then there's the case of an LTA who I now feel like an absolute idiot into thinking they were a good faith user. And my rant could go on.

On top of that, real life issues mean that I can no longer edit as much as I used to, and so just a quick note to let you all know that I won't be much active in the near future – for at least the end of this year.

With that being said, you will still see me make an edit now and then, add some coordinates, and probably do a couple of rollbacks on edits by Brendan, and probably close vfd nominations. I'm not leaving forever, and I do hope I can come back and become more active when things have settled, but until then, I wish the best for the community :-)

--SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta.wikimedia) 11:08, 14 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

I'm sure we'll all be happy to see you whenever it works out. Who knows, maybe we'll be lucky and that will even be before the end of the year.
(Don't blame yourself for believing people to be good until thoroughly proven otherwise. That's a sign that you're a good person!) WhatamIdoing (talk) 18:00, 14 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
Have a great real life and we'll still be here whenever you drop by. Thanks for all the great work you do! Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:13, 14 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
Recharge your batteries, SHB. We all hope that you'll feel better soon and if you are up to freely giving your labor and expertise, we'd love to have it. —Justin (koavf)TCM 20:50, 14 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
Thanks to all of you :) I'm not gone forever tho, so you'll still see me popping around. SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta.wikimedia) 08:26, 15 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
Thanks from me too for what you've done. Good luck with your life, and I'll be glad to see you here, regardless of whether you are going to do much or little. –LPfi (talk) 10:49, 15 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

16:01, 21 March 2022 (UTC)

Main page photo credits

Thought you should know that when updating Main Page/Photo credits you are supposed to use the uncropped image not the cropped banner. Tai123.123 (talk) 02:41, 22 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Why though? Since we're featuring the derivative work, per the licensing requirements, we're supposed to use the derivative work – meaning attributing both the original copyright holder and the author of the derivative work. The original copyright holder has no control over the derivative work and so technically not giving attribution to the derivative would theoretically be a copyvio. However, most of us who cropped the photos won't really mind too much, but it's good to get into the habit of correct attribution. SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta.wikimedia) 09:53, 22 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
I don’t know enough about copyright to answer your question but if you look at previous revisions of the page it has featured uncropped images since 2013. If you want this changed go ask on a talk page or the pub. Tai123.123 (talk) 18:10, 22 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
I am not aware of any discussion on this, and the instructions for updating say little. Cropping may not reach the threshold of originality needed for copyright, so the only copyright holder may be the author of the original photo (and possibly those of photographed works). That copyright holder needs to be attributed, but they may not like how we cropped their image – and anyway, as separate image, the original is often nicer – so showing their version makes sense. I don't know whether that's the reasoning behind the practice, just trying to come up with a plausible explanation. –LPfi (talk) 11:12, 23 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
But we have no control over the license used here, and if the copyright holder doesn't like the way we cropped it, too bad. CC BY SA licenses are irrevocable. Cropping is still a derivative work and per the license, it does not matter whether it's a simple crop, or a large photoshop of the original, and as such, we have to attribute both the original copyright holder and the author of the derivative work. SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta.wikimedia) 11:31, 23 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
If the crop is below the threshold of originality it does not get a copyright and thus it can be used with no licence from the person who did the crop; the only relevant licence is then that of the underlying work. Out of courtesy we should still attribute the person who did the crop, but out of courtesy we should also give credit for the work the original author created, especially if the crop is odd in some way. At least some licences require you to tell about changes you made, so this is a reason to somehow notice that it wasn't the original that we used. But, anyway, I think this is enough reasoning from my part, unless we start a discussion on how we should attribute people regarding these images, and such a discussion should probably be had in the Pub. –LPfi (talk) 13:32, 23 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

I am also in doubt

I am also in doubt about that matter. But I have no intention of touting or promotion. So, I used the links from the Google Maps (which are the primary source for their location and basic information). I am not sure if all these sacred sites have their own official websites or not. Haoreima (talk) 08:41, 23 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Another thing, I still don't know how to extract coordinates (latitudes and longitudes) from the Google Maps. Haoreima (talk) 08:42, 23 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
Yeah tbh since about a quarter of the active Wikivoyage community knows you, it's obvious it's no form of promotion but if the sites don't have their own websites, what you can do is just link the relevant city article and then add the link from that city article. For some article that resembles something like that, an article I've recently been working on is Tasmanian national parks, and in particular take a look at the national parks (though this section violates WV:IP) and the historic sites sections (which is currently a work in progress). It's not perfect, but the point is that they are not directly linked from the topic article, but rather mentioned in all the relevant destination articles. SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta.wikimedia) 08:53, 23 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
@Haoreima Also regarding the coordinates, it's actually pretty easy to do. I found it difficult in my early days of contributing to this site, but I quickly got the hang of it. Special:Diff/4414347 is my latest example of adding coordinates, in which I entered -43.73314 and 170.0952 into my lat and long parameters.
The first thing you'll need to note is that Google Maps won't allow you to pinpoint the exact coordinates at once. What I do is I pinpoint them a bit off to the side, in which this case, I pinpointed it on -43.73314, 170.094996 and then adjusted it to the right a bit. There is also a good guide at Wikivoyage:Dynamic maps Expedition. Let me know if you need any more help. I'd be happy to explain :-) Also while I'm at it, there's a good tool when using the listing editor too which all you need to do is pinpoint the spot and then you've got your coords. SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta.wikimedia) 10:19, 23 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for the suggestion of getting latitudes and longitudes. I understand now. But about the first reply you told me, I still have a little confusion. Could you do one for me so that I may be able to understand properly? After that, I will handle the remaining. Haoreima (talk) 13:09, 23 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
@Haoreima: Sorry for the late reply. I did it on the second one using Imphal as an example. SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta.wikimedia) 11:44, 29 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for doing that! Since Imphal is a large place, it has many sacred sites of Panthoibi herself. Shall I add all in the list in the same way like you added? Haoreima (talk) 12:23, 29 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
Go ahead and add them in whichever city, town or destination it is located in. SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta.wikimedia) 23:48, 29 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

This Month in Education: March 2022

The Signpost: 27 March 2022

News, reports and features from the English Wikipedia's weekly journal about Wikipedia and Wikimedia
  • Eyewitness Wikimedian – Vinnytsia, Ukraine: War diary

19:55, 28 March 2022 (UTC)

type=vicinity

I think it'd be better to reserve "type=vicinity" to destinations that are in the vicinity. I don't know whether the designation used is visible anywhere at the moment, but you never know. Before the last rewrite of the template, hovering over a marker would say something like "show map for this vicinity marker"; something like that could be added somewhere by somebody. Instead, if you want a red marker, write "type=red" (choose among colours listed). Maybe that requires adding "red" to the show parameter of the dynamic map, but having to do that is not counter-intuitive, we just need to add it to the documentation. –LPfi (talk) 09:01, 30 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Better yet, we should have a standard on what markers to use for "other destinations". Have we had one? –LPfi (talk) 09:02, 30 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
I use "type=other" for "other destinations", because it seems intuitive. —Granger (talk · contribs) 10:48, 30 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
Intuitive but also confusing, because the markers on the map have the same color as type=listing. So if you use both, you get 2x a green marker with nr 1 on the map. FredTC (talk) 11:07, 30 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
I've always thought that we were meant to use "city" for cities and "vicinity" for listings in "other destinations". iirc, in my early days at this site, I saw a mix of both no type (which defaults to listing) and vicinity. I've just been standardizing them since. 1 Using other could work, but the reason why I thought we used the dark red color was to distinguish them from the normal forestgreen color. A quick look on Special:PermaLink/4129235#Other destinations tells me we've been using it for quite some time. SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta.wikimedia) 11:22, 30 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
Special:PermaLink/4276092 too. SHB2000 (talk | contribs | meta.wikimedia) 11:30, 30 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
@FredTC: I rarely or never specify "type=listing" (though I sometimes leave it in by default). When I list "other destinations", it's usually in a region or country article, so the main types are "type=other" and "type=city". —Granger (talk · contribs) 08:36, 1 April 2022 (UTC)Reply
@Mx. Granger: I checked a few countries from Middle East and already nr 3 (Iran) would have double green marker numbers if "vicinity" would be changed into "other". Something strange happened when I was trying to check, after making the change, using "Show preview" the markers in the text turned green, but the markers on the map were unchanged. After using "Publish changes" the markers on the map turned green, causing a situation with 2x a green "1" an 2x a green "2". I also checked the other countries of Middle East and they would not have that problem, so you are not at all the only one "rarely or never" creating the situation. But still I think that someone not knowing about this, could create situations with double numbers on the map. The {{listing|...}} always had green markers and that should stay that way. But I think a {{marker|type=other|...}} and also a {{listing|type=other|...}} should not create green markers. --FredTC (talk) 12:13, 1 April 2022 (UTC)Reply
The problem in the Iran article is the embassies, which should not be listed there. Embassy listings should be in city articles, not country articles. It's also worth noting that Iran currently has double red markers (for "type=go" and "type=vicinity") – slightly different shades of red, but that's not obvious unless you're paying close attention. So it seems to me the Iran article is an argument for using green rather than red for "other destinations". But maybe choosing some other color would be best. —Granger (talk · contribs) 12:56, 1 April 2022 (UTC)