If we're keeping the article, we need to move it to Hồ Tràm, but are we keeping it? If we don't, where would the listings be moved to? Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:35, 10 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

IMHO, this page is pure spam and touty language, and should be nuked with no remorse. But it's just my opinion. Ibaman (talk) 11:48, 10 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Now technically per policy it's supposed to go via WV:VfD, but as I see it, for articles like these that don't really fall into blatant touting, it isn't technically meant to be speedily deleted. Maybe I'll propose what I've been wanting to propose for a while soon about unhelpable stub articles like this. //shb (t | c | m) 12:36, 10 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Done at Wikivoyage talk:Deletion policy#Speedily deleting abandoned stub articles. Were that policy to gain consensus, that would in theory allow us to delete this on July 16. //shb (t | c | m) 13:46, 10 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

I'm willing to format and de-tout this. I think there is some content that can be saved. Ground Zero (talk) 14:58, 10 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

That didn't take very long. Ground Zero (talk) 15:24, 10 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Thank you very much for whipping the article into shape! Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:36, 10 July 2025 (UTC)Reply