| DotM banner archives: 2013 • 2014 • 2015 • 2016 • 2017 • 2018 • 2019 • 2020 • 2021 • 2022 • 2023 • 2024 • 2025 • 2026 |
Archived banners for destinations featured on the Main Page in 2025.
- Support LGTM. --SHB2000 (t | c | m) 22:23, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (t | c | m) 22:23, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Support. --Comment by Selfie City (talk) (contributions) 16:57, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support. --Comment by Selfie City (talk) (contributions) 16:57, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --SHB (t | c | m) 22:06, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
Banners for our February and March features! --Ypsilon (talk) 17:16, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- All the banners on this page look good, but are there any alternatives to consider? Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:20, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support. --Comment by Selfie City (talk) (contributions) 16:58, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --SHB (t | c | m) 22:06, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support. --Comment by Selfie City (talk) (contributions) 16:58, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --SHB (t | c | m) 22:06, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (t | c | m) 21:46, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
- Support. --Comment by Selfie City (talk) (contributions) 16:59, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support. --Comment by Selfie City (talk) (contributions) 16:59, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --SHB (t | c | m) 22:06, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
Banners for the upcoming articles! --Ypsilon (talk) 17:20, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support all. These look excellent. Thank you. --Comment by Selfie City (talk) (contributions) 17:45, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support LGTM. --SHB (t | c | m) 00:26, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support. --Comment by Selfie City (talk) (contributions) 16:59, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --SHB (t | c | m) 22:07, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support. --Comment by Selfie City (talk) (contributions) 17:45, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support. --Comment by Selfie City (talk) (contributions) 17:45, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --shb (t | c | m) 05:03, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
- Support. --Comment by Selfie City (talk) (contributions) 17:45, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support. --Comment by Selfie City (talk) (contributions) 17:45, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
- @SelfieCity, Ypsilon: Here are two more alternative banners. --shb (t | c | m) 05:02, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you. I think the first alternative banner is my favorite. --Comment by Selfie City (talk) (contributions) 19:09, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
- All of them look nice, but why not go with the market hall (alt banner 1) as SC suggested. --Ypsilon (talk) 19:19, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
- That's my favourite too. //shb (t | c | m) 21:15, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
- I like the Market Hall Banner. It is over 20 years since I was in Krakow, but this is a view that I remember, and it is more distinctive than the alternatives. AlasdairW (talk) 21:31, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
- That's my favourite too. //shb (t | c | m) 21:15, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
- Support. --Comment by Selfie City (talk) (contributions) 17:45, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --SHB (t | c | m) 00:28, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support. --Comment by Selfie City (talk) (contributions) 17:45, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support. At first I had some doubts as the photo shows barriers ahead and it looks like the entrance to a private facility, but I checked on Streetview and it is the end of the route. AlasdairW (talk) 23:46, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
- Strong Support – woah, this is a top-tier banner. --SHB (t | c | m) 00:27, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
- A banner for Snowdonia. --Ypsilon (talk) 15:32, 30 April 2025 (UTC)
- Support //shb (t | c | m) 02:58, 22 May 2025 (UTC)
- Support I like this view. AlasdairW (talk) 22:25, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
- Support //shb (t | c | m) 02:58, 22 May 2025 (UTC)
- Support //shb (t | c | m) 02:58, 22 May 2025 (UTC)
- Support //shb (t | c | m) 02:58, 22 May 2025 (UTC)
*Support //shb (t | c | m) 02:59, 22 May 2025 (UTC)
- I'm fine with both. --Ypsilon (talk) 04:22, 22 May 2025 (UTC)
- The second one seems to more specifically picture this park. The first one could be from many other places. –LPfi (talk) 10:10, 22 May 2025 (UTC)
- Support The second one.Veracious (talk) 06:33, 1 July 2025 (UTC)
- Support //shb (t | c | m) 02:59, 22 May 2025 (UTC)
- Three banners to choose from for Expo 2025: Banner 1 shows Kansai Signature Pavilion "null²", Banner 2 shows the Grand Ring from the air (the article banner has some similarities, but I think it is sufficiently different), Banner 3 shows The official mascot Myaku Myaku standing in front of the Grand Ring.
- I haven't been to the Expo and there are plenty more photos on Commons that are suitable, so further contributions are very welcome. I had to trim the blurb as the original one was too long, but please refine this.
- Which banner do you prefer AlasdairW (talk) 21:45, 16 July 2025 (UTC)?
- 3, 2, 1 AlasdairW (talk) 21:45, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
- 3, 1, 2. //shb (t | c | m) 22:37, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
- 3, 2, 1 for me as well. Since Expo 2025 would be an additional feature separate from other FTTs, I've changed the
typeparameter to be "event" instead. ― Wauteurz (talk) 11:56, 17 July 2025 (UTC)- That icon looks perfect; cheers, Wauteurz! //shb (t | c | m) 12:30, 17 July 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you, but I can't take credit for the icon, as it comes from the OOUI iconset (Wikimedia inferface icons). ― Wauteurz (talk) 13:42, 17 July 2025 (UTC)
- That icon looks perfect; cheers, Wauteurz! //shb (t | c | m) 12:30, 17 July 2025 (UTC)
- 3, 1, 2 for me. Looks like 3 is going to be the unanimous top choice. ChubbyWimbus (talk) 12:14, 17 July 2025 (UTC)
- 3, 1, 2. 2 last because that's the picture used for the article's own banner.--Ypsilon (talk) 16:56, 17 July 2025 (UTC)
- It is a similar view, but a different picture, taken from a different viewpoint by the same photographer 20 minutes later. AlasdairW (talk) 21:07, 17 July 2025 (UTC)
- Support I do love the semi-industrial setting, too. //shb (t | c | m) 02:59, 22 May 2025 (UTC)
- Support //shb (t | c | m) 02:59, 22 May 2025 (UTC)
And more banners for the upcoming months. --Ypsilon (talk) 13:50, 1 May 2025 (UTC)
- Support //shb (t | c | m) 02:59, 22 May 2025 (UTC)
Here's a set banners for September's and October's articles. --Ypsilon (talk) 18:45, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
- Support //shb (t | c | m) 22:48, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
- Support //shb (t | c | m) 22:49, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
- Support //shb (t | c | m) 22:49, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
- Support LGTM. //shb (t | c | m) 22:51, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
- Support. --Comment by Selfie City (talk) (contributions) 16:59, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support --SHB (t | c | m) 22:06, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- Support //shb (t | c | m) 22:51, 28 July 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Comment by Selfie City (talk) (contributions) 16:37, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
- Seems fine. Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:13, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
Banners for November and December, i.e. the rest of 2025. As always, feel free to create more if you like. --Ypsilon (talk) 18:07, 25 September 2025 (UTC)
- Support nice – and I do love the snow on the mountains too, would be fitting for the time of year we're featuring it in. //shb (t | c | m) 22:52, 25 September 2025 (UTC)
- Support — excellent banner. --Comment by Selfie City (talk) (contributions) 16:38, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nice one. Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:13, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Comment by Selfie City (talk) (contributions) 16:38, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
- Appealing. I like it. Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:13, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
- Support //shb (t | c | m) 23:14, 25 September 2025 (UTC)
- Support — good one. --Comment by Selfie City (talk) (contributions) 16:38, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
- Not an inherently exciting subject, but a good composition and shape, so I approve. I'd say that the banner in the article is nicer, though, as is File:Air Force One Landing at San Diego International Airport, October 22, 1984.jpg though it's low-quality. Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:16, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
- Support Someonehere12345 (talk) (contributions) 17:45, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Support love the vibrant colours. //shb (t | c | m) 23:31, 25 September 2025 (UTC)
- Support per SHB. --Comment by Selfie City (talk) (contributions) 16:38, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
- This is great and really gets across the excitement of Kowloon. Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:17, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
- Support this really conveys a sense of energy. Mrkstvns (talk) 16:04, 5 November 2025 (UTC)
Banner for El Cuyo. Ypsilon (talk) 17:23, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Comment by Selfie City (talk) (contributions) 16:41, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
- Support //shb (t | c | m) 06:20, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- Picturesque and nice. Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:21, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
- Looks good to me. Mrkstvns (talk) 14:05, 21 October 2025 (UTC)
- Support //shb (t | c | m) 23:31, 25 September 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Comment by Selfie City (talk) (contributions) 16:40, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
- Why can't we use the banner from the article, which gets the problem of scarcity across better? Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:19, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
- I think it is better not to use the same photo as the article banner, but here is one of the two other possibilities that were considered for the article banner. This shows a man drinking camel milk and I like how the camel in the background sets the scene. AlasdairW (talk) 22:59, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
- I'm OK with that. But why is it better not to use the same photo as the article banner? Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:52, 20 October 2025 (UTC)
- I prefer this alternative; it's a more interesting photo and better representation of the topic. --Comment by Selfie City (talk) (contributions) 03:33, 20 October 2025 (UTC)
- I like the alternative too. The first looks too much like a water glass in a first-world restaurant while the alternative looks like a place where dehydration would be a serious issue. Mrkstvns (talk) 14:03, 21 October 2025 (UTC)
- I think both are fairly good to me and I don't mind either being used. //shb (t | c | m) 07:03, 20 October 2025 (UTC)
- A 3:1 crop of the article banner would show more text, which I think would make the picture less good. The water sachets in the article banner are intended for a ship's lifeboat and were made in 2006. Displaying a 2006 manufacture date on the main page in 2026 is not great. AlasdairW (talk) 20:57, 20 October 2025 (UTC)
- I don't think the manufacture date matters. In an emergency, you'll drink water, regardless of when it was put into bags. Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:07, 20 October 2025 (UTC)
- A 3:1 crop of the article banner would show more text, which I think would make the picture less good. The water sachets in the article banner are intended for a ship's lifeboat and were made in 2006. Displaying a 2006 manufacture date on the main page in 2026 is not great. AlasdairW (talk) 20:57, 20 October 2025 (UTC)
- I prefer this alternative; it's a more interesting photo and better representation of the topic. --Comment by Selfie City (talk) (contributions) 03:33, 20 October 2025 (UTC)
- I'm OK with that. But why is it better not to use the same photo as the article banner? Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:52, 20 October 2025 (UTC)

French
Deutsch