French
Deutsch| ← March 2025 | Votes for deletion archives for April 2025 | (current) May 2025 → |
To start with, veterans' homes aren't tourist sites. And it isn't calls "Retsil Veterans' Home", it's Washington Veterans Home Port Orchard. The cemetery isn't a National Veterans Cemetery. Is there anything here that is worth keeping? Ground Zero (talk) 11:07, 19 March 2025 (UTC)
- There's nothing in w:Retsil, Washington. Should this article be deleted or redirected? Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:32, 19 March 2025 (UTC)
- Delete. If there were content to move over, I would do that. We have nothing to say about this place. Ground Zero (talk) 17:08, 19 March 2025 (UTC)
- Agreed. Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:22, 19 March 2025 (UTC)
- Delete. If there were content to move over, I would do that. We have nothing to say about this place. Ground Zero (talk) 17:08, 19 March 2025 (UTC)
- Delete unless it actually is a tourist attraction (because it has lovely gardens or whatever) in which case make a See listing in Port Orchard & turn this article into a redirect. Pashley (talk) 18:37, 19 March 2025 (UTC)
- Delete, unless actual visitor information, like weekly tours of the home are speedily added. The nearest hotel is already listed in Port Orchard. I am surprised that this article has been sitting there for nearly 20 years, but I see that the article is not linked for any travel pages- it was removed from Kitsap Peninsula on 14 March 2013. AlasdairW (talk) 22:07, 19 March 2025 (UTC)
- Delete per GZ and Pashley. //shb (t | c | m) 21:35, 19 March 2025 (UTC)
Outcome: deleted. //shb (t | c | m) 08:28, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
A really broad travel topic, for which we have well-written articles like cultural attractions, natural attractions, and also destinations. Better redirecting it to destinations. Sbb1413 (he) (talk • contribs) 03:04, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. //shb (t | c | m) 08:29, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
- What about instead redirecting it to Cultural attractions, which links Natural attractions in the lead paragraph. I see no harm in such a redirect, and somebody might have linked or bookmarked the page. –LPfi (talk) 12:38, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
- I've got no issues with a redirect; that also works. //shb (t | c | m) 13:21, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
- What about instead redirecting it to Cultural attractions, which links Natural attractions in the lead paragraph. I see no harm in such a redirect, and somebody might have linked or bookmarked the page. –LPfi (talk) 12:38, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Outcome: redirected to cultural attractions. //shb (t | c | m) 11:01, 19 April 2025 (UTC)