Wikivoyage:Votes for deletion/June 2026

May 2026 Votes for deletion archives for June 2026 (current) July 2026

Template imported from Wikipedia with zero discussions, violating our template policy. Plus, we don't have such a template for each and every non-Latin script, including even Cyrillic and Devanagari. Sbb1413 (he) (talkcontribs) 13:48, 11 June 2026 (UTC)reply

Can Meitei text be rendered without this template? Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:00, 11 June 2026 (UTC)reply
The template does not in any way assist in rendering: it is purely a notice that users will either see the characters properly or some kind of stand-in from the browser. The text of the article is identical if the template is not there. ―Justin (koavf)TCM 14:03, 11 June 2026 (UTC)reply
Yes, and I guess it's useful only if a given article is full of non-Latin texts, which is not always the case on Wikivoyage. Sbb1413 (he) (talkcontribs) 14:57, 11 June 2026 (UTC)reply
Heads up that I added noinclude because without it, all pages trancsluding the template were added to Category:Vfd. ―Justin (koavf)TCM 14:07, 11 June 2026 (UTC)reply
Thanks. Sbb1413 (he) (talkcontribs) 14:55, 11 June 2026 (UTC)reply
I'm not sure on this one. I think there should be some kind of disclaimer on phrasebooks with odd or obscure scripts not supported by every browser or loads very slowly (which is still an unfortunate reality for many parts of the world). //shb (t | c | m) 21:25, 11 June 2026 (UTC)reply
What makes more sense is having a generic template for non-Latin scripts. Since this is not Wikipedia, where we are liable to deal with all kinds of nuanced edge cases and localized versions of names and actual articles about obscure writing systems, there's a pretty minimal amount of non-Latin writing, especially outside of phrasebooks. ―Justin (koavf)TCM 21:58, 11 June 2026 (UTC)reply
I agree, but since this template already exists, I think it's much, much easier to just reformat this template as such instead of deleting this and creating a new one for non-Latin scripts in general. //shb (t | c | m) 22:00, 11 June 2026 (UTC)reply
Delete. I like Koavf's suggestion of a generic template.
Would it be enough to just tell people -- in a template message or at Wikivoyage:Welcome,_newcomers, or both -- that they should enable Unicode support (w:UTF-16?) in their browser if that is not the default? Looks like that would cover Meitei; w:Meetei Mayek (Unicode block) Pashley (talk) 02:24, 12 June 2026 (UTC)reply
Keep. Having odd rectangles telling the Unicode code points in any listing telling local names and addresses is confusing; some readers may think our site is broken. Explaining the issue and giving advice for installing the needed font(s) is useful – once there [at the destination], it is nice if one's device can show those local names and addresses. Wikivoyage:Meitei script display help should be rewritten, though, probably with links to step-by-step instructions on browser sites.
Unicode support (for me, w:UTF-8 rather than UTF-16) isn't enough, you need the fonts. What other scripts aren't supported by default in the most common browsers? For me, e.g. Tibetan has the same issue. I assume smartphones may support fewer scripts. Thai? Georgian? Inuktitut?
LPfi (talk) 08:43, 12 June 2026 (UTC)reply
If we delete this, we should also delete Wikivoyage:Meitei script display help or replace it with a generic Unicode help page.
Is this a real problem? My browser (Firefox on Linux) happily renders Meitei fonts without me doing anything special to enable it. Do other browsers fail here? Pashley (talk) 03:05, 12 June 2026 (UTC)reply
Mine (Chrome on macOS) can be a hit or miss for more obscure scripts (something like Divehi or Cree). //shb (t | c | m) 07:04, 12 June 2026 (UTC)reply
Mine (Firefox on Debian) doesn't support Meitei, Tibetan, or seemingly even Korean by default (while some other odd scripts show fine). Adding the fonts is easy, though. I assume "hit or miss for more obscure scripts" is what to expect on most platforms. –LPfi (talk) 08:57, 12 June 2026 (UTC)reply

Outcome: there is no consensus to delete this template. //shb (t | c | m) 02:02, 26 June 2026 (UTC)reply