Wikivoyage talk:Abuse filters

Rash of touts in the 2026 range

[edit source]

There is currently a rash of touting of hotels and restaurants by several IP accounts with visible identities starting with 2026. Can we block that range? If we can, let's please do it, as it's clearly going to be in vain to post touting warnings to each one of these, only for other socks to continue the touting. Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:48, 10 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

I assume that you can see the IP addresses (I haven't asked for that permission myself), and I assume that they belong to quite a big block, which shouldn't be blocked for any long time. I don't think they need more tout warnings if they clearly are the same person – one should suffice. –LPfi (talk) 19:19, 10 February 2026 (UTC)Reply
Sure, I could see the IP addresses but haven't been bothering to do so, just like you. That said, the rash of touting surprisingly ceased or paused after I had reverted it from I think 4 IP accounts. Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:10, 13 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Local filter 35

[edit source]

I think this filter is unnecessary, given that there is (private) global filter 35 (both the local and global filters prevent the same pattern). If you want to disable the local filter, let me know and I will opt-in this project in the global filter. Thanks. Codename Noreste (talk) 23:19, 14 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Late, but I'd rather the local filter over the global filter. //shb (t | c | m) 01:29, 8 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Article/Wikivoyage blanking by unregistered/new user

[edit source]
Swept in from the pub

I'm trying to remove the group= from markers on the Appalachian Trail article, and instead add coordinates to the mapframes so they show up. I'm not blanking the page, but I am removing a lot of "text". Is this a universal rule? Blamegroovy (talk) 21:32, 6 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

I would urge caution in removing the "group=" parameter from the markers in Appalachian Trail. The marker numbering doesn't work when there are more than 99 of the same marker, so the groups may have been added to address this. I suggest that you outline the changes that you want to make on Talk:Appalachian Trail, perhaps with a small example, so that editors familiar with that article can comment. Then after a few days, make the changes in small steps, so that you don't trigger the filter which detects a large amount of text being removed. AlasdairW (talk) 22:09, 6 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
It's close, but there don't seem to be 99 of the same marker. They're linked to the map frame with group=, but that seems to have broken at some point. I can apply the changes stepwise? It's always possible to revert them afterwards! Blamegroovy (talk) 22:23, 6 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Error on my own page

[edit source]
Swept in from the pub

Got this message on an edit I tried to make on MY OWN userpage:

Unfortunately, this action has been automatically identified as harmful, and therefore disallowed.

If you believe your action was constructive, please leave a message on the travellers' pub. In your message, state what you were trying to do and the title of the page you were trying to edit.

A brief description of the abuse rule which your action matched is: Unregistered or New user blanking someone else's user or user talk page

Here is my abuse log for confirmation
https://fr.wikivoyage.org/w/index.php?title=Special:AbuseLog&wpSearchUser=ThatEquatorialGuineaEditor+%28alt%29

What? It's my page! Wdym? ThatEquatorialGuineaEditor (alt) (talk) 12:57, 29 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

@SHB2000: created an anti-spam filter (#66) that seems to be catching you. Maybe they can help. Ground Zero (talk) 13:06, 29 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
Okay. Thanks. ThatEquatorialGuineaEditor (alt) (talk) 13:07, 29 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
66 is flag-only (mainly so it can get picked up by SWViewer), seems to be 35 that's catching your edits – the main issue here seems to be that your account isn't autoconfirmed. I've given you confirmed perms since your other account is already autoconfirmed which should hopefully stop the filter from disallowing your edits. //shb (t | c | m) 13:14, 29 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
Thank you! ThatEquatorialGuineaEditor (alt) (talk) 13:18, 29 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
It was filter 35 that was the culprit. It seems the error was my fault: I used a construction that didn't work as expected. I am sorry. –LPfi (talk) 16:48, 29 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
It is all good! ThatEquatorialGuineaEditor (alt) (talk) 02:13, 30 April 2026 (UTC)Reply